PETA - PEOPLE FOR ENEMY OF TAMILNADU

Who is PETA (PEOPLE FOR ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS) but I call it as PEOPLE FOR ENEMY OF TAMILNADU. They themselves called as Animal Rights Organization based on Norfolk, Virginia and led by Ingrid Newkrik, its international president, founded in Mar 22, 1980. We don’t want that much information about these cruel people. Let us see how they rooted to Indian soil like the British did earlier, and who are the supporters to make them this much influential person to say. If Tamilnadu conducted Jallikattu it is unconstitutional and impose president rule, how a NGO can use these kinds of terms in our soil.

PETA in the year 2007 EUTHANIZED nearly 81 animals in their shelter. Their work is that they rescue the stray dogs, animals from circus and abandoned animals to their shelters, they will wait for the fund to maintain the animals, if the proper fund is not raised they EUTHANIZED the animals. I mentioned the word EUTHANIZED in bold and capital letters. You can think why this much importance is given to the word, yes we should see the meaning of the word, i.e. MERCY KILLING. Who gave the rights to PETA to perform EUTHANASIA? But they call themselves as Savior of animals.

              Above are some of the worst things about PETA, now we can see their journey to India to ban our traditional sport  Jallikattu.

JOURNEY TO INDIA

In PETA’s point of view Jallikattu is cruelty to animals but its our tradition the real cruelty is happening in many part of the world but their complete focus is on Jallikattu only. It shows some Geopolitics involved and is strongly supported by our corrupted politicians. This made PETA to enter India so ease.

PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ACT,1960 (PCA)

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals "Act,1960 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals and to amend the laws relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals.^[1] As per the provisions of the law the government of India formed the Animal Welfare Board of India.

AWBI :

Established in 1962 under sec 4 of the prevention of cruelty to animals act 1960, the board was initially within the jurisdiction of the Government of India's Ministry of Food and agriculture. In 1990 this was transferred under Ministry of Environment and Forests.

3. Duties of persons having charge of animals : It shall be the duty of every person having the care or charge of any animal to take all reasonable measures to ensure the well-being of such animal and to prevent the infliction upon such animal of unnecessary pain or suffering.

5 Constitution of the Board : 

(1) The Board shall consist of the following persons, namely: 

(a) the Inspector General of Forests, Government of India, ex-officio, 

(b) the Animal Husbandry Commissioner to the Government of India, ex-officio; 

4 (ba) two persons to represent respectively the Ministries of the Central Government dealing with Home Affairs and Education, to be appointed by the Central Government; 

(bb) one person to represent the Indian Board for Wild Life, to be appointed by the Central Government; 

(bc) three persons who, in the opinion of the Central Government, are or have been actively engaged in animal welfare work and are well-known humanitarians, to be nominated by the Central Government;) 

(c) one person to represent such association of veterinary practitioners as in the opinion of the Central Government ought to be represented on the Board, to be elected by that association in the prescribed manner; 

(d) two persons to represent practitioners of modern and indigenous systems of medicine, to be nominated by the Central Government; 

(e) one person to represent each of such two municipal corporations as in the opinion of the Central Government ought to be represented on the Board, to be elected by each of the said corporations in the prescribed manner 

(f) one person to represent each of such three organisations actively interested in animal welfare as in the opinion of the Central Government ought to be represented on the Board, to be chosen by each of the said organisations in the prescribed manner; 

(g) one person to represent each of such three societies dealing with prevention of cruelty to animal as in the opinion of the Central Government ought to be represented on the Board, to be chosen, in the prescribed manner; 

(h) three persons to be nominated by the Central Government, 

(i) six Members of Parliament, four to be elected by the House of the People (Lok Sabha) and two by the Council of States (Rajya Sabha). 

(2) Any of the persons referred to in clause 9a) or 6 [clause (b) or clause (ba) or clause (bb) of sub-section (1) may depute any other person to attend any of the meetings of the Board. 

(3) The Central Government shall nominate one of the members of the Board to be its Chairman and another member of the Board to be its Vice-Chairman.)

8 Funds of the Board : 

                                 The funds of the Board shall consist of grants made to it from time to Board time by the Government and of contributions, subscriptions, bequests, gifts and the like made to it by any local authority or by any other person

11. Treating animals cruelly : (1) If any person 

(a) beats, kicks, over-rides, over-drives, over-loads, tortures or otherwise treats any animal so as to subject it to unnecessary pain or suffering or causes, or being the owner permits, any animal to be so treated; or

 (b) 13(employs in any work or labour or for any purpose any animal which, by reason of its age or any disease) infirmity; wound, sore or other cause, is unfit to be so employed or, being the owner, permits any such unfit animal to be employed; or

 (c) wilfully and unreasonably administers any injurious drug or injurious substance to 14(any animal) or wilfully and unreasonably causes or attempts to cause any such drug or substance to be taken by 15(any animal;) or 

(d) conveys or carries, whether in or upon any vehicle or not, any animal in such a manner or position as to subject it to unnecessary pain or suffering; or 

(e) keeps or confines any animal in any -cage or other receptacle which does not measure sufficiently in height, length and breadth to permit the animal a reasonable opportunity for movement; or 

(f) keeps for an unreasonable time any animal chained or tethered upon an unreasonably short or unreasonably heavy chain or cord; or 

(g) being the owner, neglects to exercise or cause to be exercised reasonably any dog habitually chained up or kept in close confinement; or 

(h) being the owner of (any animal) fails to provide such animal with sufficient food, drink or shelter; or 

(i) without reasonable cause, abandons any animal in circumstances which tender it likely that it will suffer pain by reason of starvation thirst; or 

(j) wilfully permits any animal, of which he is the owner, to go at large in any street, while the animal is affected with contagious or infectious disease or, without reasonable excuse permits any diseased or disabled animal, of which he is the owner, to die in any street; or 

(k) offers for sale or without reasonable cause, has in his possession any animal which is suffering pain by reason of mutilation, starvation, thirst, overcrowding or other illtreatment; or 

16{(1) mutilates any animal or kills any animal (including stray dogs) by using the method of strychnine injections, in the heart or in any other unnecessarily cruel manner or;) 

17{(m) solely with a view to providing entertainment 

(i) confines or causes to be confined any animal (including tying of an animal as a bait in a tiger or other sanctuary) so as to make it an object or prey for any other animal; or 

(n) 18[xxxx] organises, keeps uses or acts in the management or, any place for animal fighting or for the purpose of baiting any animal or permits or offers any place to be so used or receives money for the admission of any other person to any place kept or used for any such purposes; or 

(o) promotes or takes part in any shooting match or competition wherein animals are released from captivity for the purpose of such shooting: he shall be punishable 19(in the case of a first offence, with fine which shall not be less than ten rup6es but which may extend to fifty rupees and in the case of a second or subsequent offence committed within three years of the previous offence, with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five rupees but which may extend, to one hundred rupees or with imprisonment for a term which may extend, to three months, or with both.] 

(2) For the purposes of section (1) an owner shall be deemed to have committed an offence if he has failed to exercise reasonable care and supervision with a view to the prevention of such offence; Provided that where an owner is convicted permitting cruelty by reason only of having failed to exercise such care and supervision, he shall not be liable to imprisonment without the option of a fine. 

(3) Nothing in this section shall apply to - 

(a) the dehorning of cattle, or the castration or branding or noseroping of any animal in the prescribed manner, or 

(b) the destruction of stray dogs in lethal chambers 20[by such other methods as may be prescribed] or 

(c) the extermination or destruction of any animal under the authority of any law for the time being in force; or 

(d) any matter dealt with in Chapter IV; or 

(e) the commission or omission of any act in the course of the destruction or the preparation for destruction of any animal as food for mankind unless such destruction or preparation was accompanied by the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering.

21. “Exhibit” and “train” defined : In this Chapter, " exhibit" means exhibit or any entertainment to which the public are admitted through sale of tickets, and "train" means train for the purpose of any such exhibition, and the expressions "exhibitor" and "trainer" have respectively the corresponding meanings.

22. Restriction on exhibition and training of performing animals : No person shall exhibit or train (i) any performing animal unless he is registered in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter; (ii) as a performing animal, any animal which the Central Government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify as an animal which shall not be exhibited or trained as a performing animal.

27. Exemptions : Nothing contained in this Chapter shall apply to - (a) the training of animals for bonafide military or police purpose or the exhibition of any animals so trained; or (b) any animals kept in any zoological garden or by any society or association which has for its principal object the exhibition of animals for educational or scientific purposes.

Above information's are the sections in PCA act, 1960. PETA refers the sections  3,11 and  22. Maneka Gandhi, our Union Cabinet Minister for Women & Child is also an animal right activist and founder of People for Animals, she is the main reason for this ban. Can you all believe this, yes it is true this statement was  made by former PETA member,  Muralidharan in an interview hosted by  Puthiya Thalaimurai channel  (see : https://youtu.be/k7vLtuyLC_A)

PETA supporters and Maneka Gandhi claim that bull is tortured during the sport, if you see the PETA India page there will be a video about Jallikattu  which was old one conducted before the Tamilnadu Jallikattu Regulation act, 2009. This video is been shown to the corporate people and funds are being raised.

PETA Chairmans Chinni krishna and his wife Nandhitha are responsible for banning Jallikattu in Tamilnadu, backed by Menaka Gandhi, along with AWBI, PETA and  there are also some animal rights NGO's  HSI (Humane society international) and PFA (people for animals) protesting against Jallikattu. PFA and HSI owned by Menaka Gandhi. PETA  providing funds for these NGO's. Our Union Minister Menaka Gandhi strongly oppose Jallikattu and another person Sowmya Reddy (daughter of Karnataka minister). Another one is Poorva joshipura CEO of  PETA co-opted member of AWBI, how come a US citizen be a member of Government of India's statuory board?

Animal welfare Board Members has animal welfare officers they are Manoj oswal PFA pune chairman and Abhishek raje sowmay reddy husband and Dr. Manilal Valliyate, who is he? He is Veterinarian in People for Animals (PFA)., these people called as animal right activists and they appoint the persons in blue cross,AWBI whom to be the leader.

Last year jallikattu case in Supreme court got struck down by the PETA members within a hour by 80 advocates in the cost 2 crores. How these NGO's get fund and still this NGO is not get blacklisted by Government of India, even not questioned how they are getting the funds.

Our recommendations are removing the bull as a performing animal from Section 22 and add it in sec 27. Our Sir karthikeyan sivasenathypathy and Somu sir explained about our bulls and foreign breeds. Our breeds called as Bos Indicus they are free ranging cattle. Free ranging cattle is nothing but permitted to graze anywhere and not confined in a small enclosure. But the foreign breeds namely Bos Taurus SWISS BRAUNVIEH, JERSEY,HOLSTEIN FRESIAN they are product of the corporates and patented. The milk form the artificial insemination breeds leads to cancer like diseases. 

In the year 2000 PETA launched in india after their warm welcome in india we lost nearly 60% if indian bull breeds. Our breed Pulikulam form sivaganga and madurai, Kangeyam from tirupur used for jallikattu which are uncastrated will yieild good strong offsprings.

Tractor Lobby :
                            Our next target is to eliminate the bullock carts that transport sugarcanes to sugar factories”.He doesn’t understand things. A farmer with a pair of bulls makes 3 trips to & fro from the fields to the sugar factory.He makes Rs.2000-3000 per day and the maintenance of the bulls costs Rs.500. He keeps those bulls just to earn a living otherwise the breeds will be extinct.   
source : https://youtu.be/-JnejI05zHo

There only aim is to ban native breeds to stop A2 type milk and importing A1 type milk because India is the highest producer of milk. We didn’t become so using Holstein Friesians or Jersy cows. Guys pls read this post and watch the videos which link is given here, This is lengthy i konw after reading this you can get the correct core picture of the issue and we will fight more ferociously. We need Jallikattu is our anthem, ut we should eradicate or destroy PETA should be our motto. We should behave like educated not just as mere degree holder. I hope this article makes you the little bit understanding of why we need jallikattu and what are the blockades and how to stop them. I feel very proud at this moment by sharing this article and somehow i contributed to this good cause. Youngsters are the future now all these NGO's boards in the name of animal welfare have seen the great history protest form our people, this shows them our unity and fighting nature for our tradition and culture.

Animal welfare Board Members has animal welfare officers they are Manoj oswal PFA pune chairman and Abhishek raje sowmay reddy husband and Dr. Manilal Valliyate, who is he? He is Veterinarian in People for Animals (PFA)., these people called as animal right activists and they appoint the persons in blue cross,AWBI whom to be the leader.

Last year jallikattu case in Supreme court got struck down by the PETA members within a hour by 80 advocates and the amount spend by PETA is 2 crores. How these NGO's get fund and still this NGO is not get blacklisted by Government of India, even not questioned how they are getting the funds.

Our recommendations are removing the bull as a performing animal from Section 22 and add it in sec 27. Our Sir karthikeyan sivasenathypathy and Somu sir explained about our bulls and foreign breeds. Our breeds called as Bos Indicus they are free ranging cattle. Free ranging cattle is nothing but permitted to graze anywhere and not confined in a small enclosure. But the foreign breeds namely Bos Taurus SWISS BRAUNVIEH, JERSEY,HOLSTEIN FRESIAN they are product of the corporates and patented. The milk form the artificial insemination breeds leads to cancer like diseases. 

In the year 2000 PETA launched in india after their warm welcome in india we lost nearly 60% if indian bull breeds. Our breed Pulikulam form sivaganga and madurai, Kangeyam from tirupur used for jallikattu which are uncastrated will yieild good strong offsprings.

Tractor Lobby :

                            Our next target is to eliminate the bullock carts that transport sugarcanes to sugar factories”. He doesn’t understand things. A farmer with a pair of bulls makes 3 trips to & fro from the fields to the sugar factory.He makes Rs.2000-3000 per day and the maintenance of the bulls costs Rs.500. He keeps those bulls just to earn a living otherwise the breeds will be extinct.   

source : https://youtu.be/-JnejI05zHo

There only aim is to ban native breeds to stop A2 type milk and importing A1 type milk because India is the highest producer of milk. We didn’t become so using Holstein Friesians or Jersy cows. Guys pls read this post and watch the videos which link is given here, This is lengthy i konw after reading this you can get the correct core picture of the issue and we will fight more ferociously. We need Jallikattu is our anthem, but we should eradicate or destroy PETA should be our motto. We should behave like educated not just as mere degree holder. I hope this article makes you the little bit understanding of why we need jallikattu and what are the blockades and how to stop them. I feel very proud at this moment by sharing this article and somehow i contributed to this good cause. Youngsters are the future now all these NGO's boards in the name of animal welfare have seen the great history protest from our people, this shows them, our unity and fighting nature for our tradition and culture.